A Call for Renewed Collaboration Among Ministries and Caregivers
The care of our elders is arguably the most heavily regulated of sectors, at least when it comes to those who live within a long-term care setting funded through our ministries of health.
Regulations, of course, ensure that one of the most vulnerable segments of our population is protected; a segment that deserves nothing short of reverence for the contributions they made to the creation of opportunities so many take for granted today.
But in such a heavily regulated system a very real risk exists that in the process of inspection, monitoring and reporting, an adversarial relationship can unintentionally be cultivated among caregivers and their overseers.
In Ontario, the Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2007, which governs the oversight of the province’s long-term care homes, is written in a punitive fashion that permits no flexibility among compliance officers to consider circumstances or to allow judgment.
The care needs of our aging population are growing ever more complex and the capacity of our long-term care providers to tackle the pressures of a stressed-out health-care system is more important than ever.
In light of the evolving reality of the sector, it’s imperative that a spirit of collaboration once again becomes the standard to which the caregiver/ministry relationship is held.
We like to think this is the way things are but we know from recent discussions with people connected to the sector that this isn’t always the case and indeed, adversarial is a word that front-line team members often use to describe their dealings with ministry inspectors, at least here in Ontario.
We speak with the front lines all the time, digging into their lives and the roles they play in the lives of the elders they serve.
Person-centred care, resident choice and empowerment; these words often spring up in our conversations and we’re confident in saying the vast majority of people working in the sector have the best-interests of the people they care for at heart each and every day.
So when a caregiver says a ministry inspector diminishes her work by failing to speak with residents during home visits and instead simply refers to a check-sheet in an impersonal and subjective process, we grow concerned that person-centredness is not reflected during this important period of oversight.
Fantastic work is being done to change the views of elderhood in our communities, but there is so much more to be done. The process is in its infancy, but it is happening.
We envision a time when ministry inspectors will arrive unannounced in a long-term care home and be welcomed by residents and team members.
In the process of inspecting the details of a home’s operation they will also seek and hear resident accounts of their lives and experiences; the triumphs of strength and empowerment we hear about every day.
One day the ministry will base funding not on a set of rules, regulations and codes, but on living experiences, quality of life, innovation and first-hand evidence of providers putting living first for the elders they serve.
A truly collaborative approach among all stakeholders — elders, caregivers, families and ministry bureaucrats and politicians — is the key to bringing this vision to life.
We’d love to hear where you see this happening already so we can share the story. Comment below or feel free to contact kristian(at)axiomnews.ca to offer your insights.
The so-far slow moving story of business evolving into a way to organize human effort explicitly for the good of society and planet has been narrated in these pages for a little over a decade. We are a long way from those first whispers of social capital and corporate social responsibility.
In a recent statement to the press, the president of the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario, Canada accused the provincial government of making a “deliberate and provocative choice to wipe out the democratic rights of tens of thousands of educators.”
With the United Nation’s (UN) International Year of the Co-operatives (IYC) 2012 just wrapping up, it’s hard to immediately discern the impact of the year. But for us, one thing rings loud and clear: IYC has built a global co-op movement whose strength is still being understood.
Many state-operated school systems are facing the challenges of scale as government education ministries have grown more centralized and massive teacher’s unions flex the muscle in their memberhip numbers.